https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107028

            Bug ID: 107028
           Summary: [13 Regression][OpenACC] ICE in install_var_field, at
                    omp-low.cc:797
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

The following fails with an ICE
 
https://github.com/OpenACCUserGroup/OpenACCV-V/blob/master/Tests/routine_bind_nonprototype_function_nonstring_function.cpp

(I find it a bit surprising that even bunch of compile errors still reach this
function, giving the ICE.)

In any case, the following reduced code (which compiles without errors) gives
an ICE,
when compiled with  'g++ -fopenacc':


class data_container {
 public:
  int data;
};

void test2() {
  data_container a;
#pragma acc data copyin(a, a.data)
{ }
}


Namely:

during GIMPLE pass: omplower
test2.cc: In function ‘void test2()’:
test2.cc:8:9: internal compiler error: in install_var_field, at omp-low.cc:797
    8 | #pragma acc data copyin(a, a.data)
      |         ^~~
0x83f00d install_var_field
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:797
0x109ab6c scan_sharing_clauses
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:1677
0x109c557 scan_omp_target
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:3110
0x109d340 scan_omp_1_stmt
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:4326
0xefcc7a walk_gimple_stmt(gimple_stmt_iterator*, tree_node*
(*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**,
int*, void*), walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:602
0xefce80 walk_gimple_seq_mod(gimple**, tree_node* (*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*,
bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:51
0xefcd91 walk_gimple_stmt(gimple_stmt_iterator*, tree_node*
(*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**,
int*, void*), walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:665
0xefce80 walk_gimple_seq_mod(gimple**, tree_node* (*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*,
bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:51
0xefcd39 walk_gimple_stmt(gimple_stmt_iterator*, tree_node*
(*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**,
int*, void*), walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:711
0xefce80 walk_gimple_seq_mod(gimple**, tree_node* (*)(gimple_stmt_iterator*,
bool*, walk_stmt_info*), tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
walk_stmt_info*)
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/gimple-walk.cc:51
0x10aadba scan_omp
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:4376
0x10aadba execute_lower_omp
        ../../repos/gcc-trunk-commit/gcc/omp-low.cc:14670

Reply via email to