https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107008
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=104883
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> A related topic is that we simply don't define the errc enumerators that
> don't have a corresponding EXXXX macro, which is non-conforming. The C++
> standard says the enumerators should all be there.
Oh that's PR 104883
