https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106817
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
> With the testcase from comment #3, it becomes:
>
> a = {CLOBBER};
> D.4223 = a + 1;
> copy (&a, &D.4223);
Right. And with -Wall one gets a bogus warning that points to the issue:
pr106817.f90:16:20:
16 | call copy (a, a+1)
| ^
Warning: 'a' is used uninitialized [-Wuninitialized]
pr106817.f90:14:14:
14 | integer :: a
| ^
note: 'a' declared here
Which makes this a 9/10/11/12/13 regression ... :-(
