[Bug middle-end/106662] [OpenMP] 'for simd firstprivate(j) lastprivate(j)' with 'parallel shared(j)' gives unexpected result

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106662

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
"Likewise with a combined construct:" – Strike that I think that's not quite
right.

Seems that one expert on omp-lang believes that for this "worksharing-simd
construct and firstprivate" example in comment 0, the proper result is "22"
also with "for simd".