https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106513
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- This subexpression has undefined behaviour: (((int64_t) 0xff) << 56).
- [Bug tree-optimization/106513] ... kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug tree-optimization/106... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
