https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106469
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=81749,
| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=96829,
| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=91547
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is a reason why GCC does not implement this "undefined" sanitize is
because it is not undefined code to wrap for unsigned integer.
It is bad that clang/LLVM implements it and people now think it is undefined
and report bugs like this.
