https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187
--- Comment #43 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 25 Jul 2022, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106187 > > --- Comment #42 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > That would be unfortunate, it removes a lot of pointless loads in this case; > and even the store it removes ought to be safe, if it weren't for the > corrupted > alias info that results (the values /are/ the same). We only need to scrap the case removing _stores_, removing loads is all fine. And the fix would, in this case, cause us to preserve the store anyway (but I expect there are cases where we can detect the store can be safely removed as well)
