https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106250
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford <rsand...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7a7fed818d238d45b18dfd927cde93b4711052d commit r13-1606-ge7a7fed818d238d45b18dfd927cde93b4711052d Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> Date: Mon Jul 11 15:59:00 2022 +0100 vect: Restore optab_vector argument [PR106250] In g:76c3041b856cb0 I'd removed a "C ? optab_vector : optab_mixed_sign" argument from a call to directly_supported_p, thinking that the argument only existed because of the condition (which I was removing). But the difference between the scalar and vector forms matters for shifts, so we do still need the argument. gcc/ PR tree-optimization/106250 * tree-vect-loop.cc (vectorizable_reduction): Reinstate final argument to directly_supported_p.
