https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090
--- Comment #2 from Yang Wang <njuwy at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> No, it's correct as it only contains do_it() call that is triggered the same
> number times as line 20 minus one.
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> No, it's correct as it only contains do_it() call that is triggered the same
> number times as line 20 minus one.
-: 0:Source:test.c
-: 0:Graph:test.gcno
-: 0:Data:test.gcda
-: 0:Runs:1
-: 1:volatile int cnt = 0;
-: 2:
-: 3:__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static int
5: 4:last (void)
-: 5:{
5: 6: return ++cnt % 5 == 0;
-: 7:}
-: 8:
-: 9:__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static void
6: 10:do_it (void)
-: 11:{
6: 12: asm volatile ("" : : "r" (&cnt) : "memory");
6: 13:}
-: 14:
1: 15:static void f1 (void)
-: 16:{
1: 17: do_it();
4: 18: for (; 0<1; do_it())
-: 19: {
5: 20: if (last ())
1: 21: break;
-: 22: }
1: 23: do_it ();
1: 24:}
-: 25:
-: 26:int
1: 27:main ()
-: 28:{
1: 29: f1 ();
-: 30:}
do_it() is indeed called 4 times,but I wonder how the coverage statistiscs of
the for-statement is calculated. It doesn't become 5 untill the for-stamentment
is completed.
-: 0:Source:test.c
-: 0:Graph:test.gcno
-: 0:Data:test.gcda
-: 0:Runs:1
-: 1:volatile int cnt = 0;
-: 2:
-: 3:__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static int
5: 4:last (void)
-: 5:{
5: 6: return ++cnt % 5 == 0;
-: 7:}
-: 8:
-: 9:__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) static void
6: 10:do_it (void)
-: 11:{
6: 12: asm volatile ("" : : "r" (&cnt) : "memory");
6: 13:}
-: 14:
1: 15:static void f1 (void)
-: 16:{
1: 17: do_it();
5: 18: for (int a=0;0<1;do_it())
-: 19: {
5: 20: if (last ())
1: 21: break;
-: 22: }
1: 23: do_it ();
1: 24:}
-: 25:
-: 26:int
1: 27:main ()
-: 28:{
1: 29: f1 ();
-: 30:}