https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to luoxhu from comment #2)
> Run if_to_switch and convert_switch again after copyprop2 could remove the
> redundant statement and expose opportunity for if-to-switch again, is this
> reasonable or just move if-to-switch/switch-conversion later run only once?  

Dunno. There was a discussion about the pass placement in the original thread.
Richi, Jakub: What do you think about it?

Reply via email to