https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105996
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem is that build_ptrmemfunc in
9587 if (TREE_CODE (pfn) != PTRMEM_CST)
9588 {
9589 if (same_type_p (to_type, pfn_type))
9590 return pfn;
9591 else if (integer_zerop (n) && TREE_CODE (pfn) != CONSTRUCTOR)
9592 return build_reinterpret_cast (input_location, to_type,
pfn,
9593 complain);
9594 }
calls build_reintepret_cast from void (A::*)() typed pfn to void (B::*)() type,
and when we then constant expression evaluate it, we reject it because
reinterpret_cast is not a core constant expression as per
https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.const#5.16
Now, is this reinterpret cast just some implementation detail under the hood in
which we should somehow arrange for REINTERPRET_CAST_P bit not be set (or
afterwards remove it)?
