https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62187
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> I've also created an LWG issue about this,
Rather than a new issue, this was added to https://wg21.link/lwg2852
The resolution was to confirm that operator== doesn't need to call compare if
it can determine the result another way. That means we can do the length check
unconditionally.
