https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836
--- Comment #23 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #22)
> An arbitrary N will only make it abuse-friendly and potentially mask bugs.
> IMO if we choose to make multiple levels here it should only be
> -fstrict-flex-arrays={1,2} where 1 (the default) only allows "[]" and 2
> allows "[0]", disabling all other size values. For anything else,
That could be ""[0]" or "[1]", disabling all other size values" if we want to
build gcc and vim with -fstrict-flex-arrays and keep fortification enabled.
Vim explicitly disables fortification right now for this reason.
> -fno-strict-flex-arrays. My opinion on the default is not strong FWIW.
Also I wonder if there should be an analogous -Wstrict-flex-arrays to issue
warnings alongside changing codegen.
