https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105810
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #4) > btw since the function is inline linkaged, the entire program would only > contain one copy of __my_glibcxx_constexpr_assert<T>. For example for > std::span::operator[] the entire program shares the bounds checking part. Isn't that already true today? span::operator[] is inline too, so there's only one copy of that, and no copies of __my_glibcxx_constexpr_assert<T> at all. You're adding lots of new symbols to the object files, which must be merged by the linker. The difference is that setting up the arguments to __glibcxx_assert_fail is in the new function, not in span::operator[].
