https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105876
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kevin Hendricks from comment #7) > It kind of flies in the face of how g++ without -flto worked over the long > term (and clang++ and even the microsoft compiler) but ... No it doesn't. It was always unspecified. You were just relying on something which was never guaranteed, incorrectly assuming it was set in stone.
