https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #32) > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26) > > That's one option, certainly easier for the users. At the least, the > > issue should be documented in install.texi so they can add > > --with-sysroot manually if need be. I just noticed that the install > > docs only have a small section on PowerPC Darwin, nothing else... > > > So wait, is the idea to add separate sections for each other architecture of > Darwin supported? Or should we just have one architecture-independent Darwin > section? When musing over this, I was thinking perhaps to have a relatively small entry [on the install webpage] for Darwin (replacing the powerpc-specific one) and just put the headlines there with a link to a new page in the wiki where we could expand upon things. I think that we would, at least, need subsections for darwin <= 10 darwin 11..14 darwin 15..19 darwin 20+ since there are some differences (e.g earlier systems _must_ have the installation into / to work properly, the middle set can have either the / install or the --sysroot= case, and the set from darwin15+ must use the --sysroot= ) there could be cause to want to describe stuff for powerpc, i686, x86_64 and arm64 separately .. .. that was why a pointer to a new wiki page seemed possibly a better solution than much churn on the webpage.
