https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64679

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek <mpola...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467

commit r13-121-ga733dea9e7c39352ce9f72059938833eaa819467
Author: Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 29 15:01:12 2022 -0400

    c++: wrong parse with functors [PR64679]

    Consider

      struct F {
        F(int) {}
        F operator()(int) const { return *this; }
      };

    and

      F(i)(0)(0);

    where we're supposed to first call the constructor and then invoke
    the operator() twice.  However, we parse this as an init-declarator:
    "(i)" looks like a perfectly valid declarator, then we see an '(' and
    think it must be an initializer, so we commit and we're toast.  My
    fix is to look a little bit farther before deciding we've seen an
    initializer.

    This is only a half of c++/64679, the other part of the PR is unrelated:
    there the problem is that we are calling pushdecl while parsing
    tentatively (in cp_parser_parameter_declaration_list), which is bad.

            PR c++/64679

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * parser.cc (cp_parser_init_declarator): Properly handle a series
of
            operator() calls, they are not part of an init-declarator.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/parse/functor1.C: New test.

Reply via email to