https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103116
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > We could make peeling for gaps handle this by making it not a flag but > indicate the number of vector(!?) iterations we need to peel. I think it'd be better to keep it in scalar iterations if possible. For example, we still need to peel for gaps when using masked LD2s if only the first vector result is needed. But we do only need to peel 1 scalar iteration, rather than a whole vector's worth. But yeah, agree that moving from 0-or-1 to a general number sounds good.
