https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105438
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So the 2 following functions are merged:
void _Z9configureILi7EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<7> (const int[7] & in, const int nrows)
{
...
void _Z9configureILi2EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<2> (const int[2] & in, const int nrows)
{
...
which have a different argument in. However I don't think one can't end with a
wrong code as nrows argument would be different in:
_Z9configureILi7EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<7> (&longer, 7);
_Z9configureILi2EEvRAT__Kii.part.0<2> (&shorter, 2);
I was unable to come up with a code that would be miscompiled.
