https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ensadc at mailnesia dot com
--- Comment #3 from ensadc at mailnesia dot com ---
I believe that `T::attr2` is a valid expression when it appears in a
requirement. So I think GCC and Clang are correct.
[expr.prim.id.general]/3:
An id-expression that denotes a non-static data member or non-static member
function of a class can only be used:
- [...]
- if that id-expression denotes a non-static data member and it appears in an
unevaluated operand.
[expr.prim.req.general]/2:
Expressions appearing within a requirement-body are unevaluated operands.
