https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I've put the [11 Regression] marker back in the summary, since it looks to have been removed accidentally. But maybe it's fixed since comment 7, so not a regression now? In which case, it shouldn't be P1, and a comment saying why it's still open would help.
