https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105253
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Note, there is some code to not do this if we'd not expand the builtin inline > since r9-4030-g06a6b46a16f9287a98aa , so I wonder what changed. That only applies to final value replacement - the niter result might be used by other passes.
