https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105181
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unknown |12.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So is it really a missed-optimization for the particular testcase? Possibly the decrement and test loop branch choice is? If I correctly match subs + b.ne as that.