https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105053
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > It also reproduces with n == 16 for me - can you produce a testcase with a
> > > static initializer that's known to fail please?
> >
> > And n == 4, but std::cout << vec; doesn't like me :P
>
> 1597201307 1817606674
> 1380347796 1721941769
> 837975613 1032707773
> 1173654292 2020064272
>
> Testcase:
>
> #include <vector>
> #include <tuple>
> #include <algorithm>
>
> int main()
> {
> const int n = 4;
> std::vector<std::tuple<int,int,double>> vec
> = { { 1597201307, 1817606674, 0. },
> { 1380347796, 1721941769, 0.},
> {837975613, 1032707773, 0.},
> {1173654292, 2020064272, 0.} } ;
> int sup1 = 0;
> for(int i=0;i<n;++i)
> sup1=std::max(sup1,std::max(std::get<0>(vec[i]),std::get<1>(vec[i])));
> int sup2 = 0;
> for(int i=0;i<n;++i)
> sup2=std::max(std::max(sup2,std::get<0>(vec[i])),std::get<1>(vec[i]));
> if (sup1 != sup2)
> std::abort ();
> return 0;
> }
This one started failing with r11-4428-g4a369d199bf2f34e.
