https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104982

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> I'm testing
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> index 02f298c2846..c74edd1aaef 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
> @@ -14182,12 +14182,12 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*jcc_bt<mode>_mask"
>  (define_split
>    [(set (match_operand:SWI248 0 "register_operand")
>         (if_then_else:SWI248
> -        (ne
> -         (zero_extract:SWI48
> -          (match_operand:SWI48 1 "register_operand")
> -          (const_int 1)
> -          (zero_extend:SI (match_operand:QI 2 "register_operand")))
> -         (const_int 0))
> +        (match_operator 5 "bt_comparison_operator"
> +         [(zero_extract:SWI48
> +           (match_operand:SWI48 1 "register_operand")
> +           (const_int 1)
> +           (zero_extend:SI (match_operand:QI 2 "register_operand")))
> +          (const_int 0)])
>          (match_operand:SWI248 3 "nonimmediate_operand")
>          (match_operand:SWI248 4 "nonimmediate_operand")))]
>    "TARGET_USE_BT && TARGET_CMOVE
> @@ -14202,6 +14202,8 @@ (define_split
>                              (match_dup 3)
>                              (match_dup 4)))]
>  {
> +  if (GET_CODE (operands[5]) == EQ)
> +    std::swap (operands[3], operands[4]);
>    operands[2] = lowpart_subreg (SImode, operands[2], QImode);
>  })

Ah, yeah - I was hoping for a solution like this.

Reply via email to