https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104918
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1 at gmx dot com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > I don't think there's anything for GCC to do here. Why not store information in the compiled object saying which virtual items are undefined? The vtable was missing because some virtual members were purely-virtual, right? > Maybe the linker should > print a note after a missing vtable error saying that they key function > needs to be defined, which is already suggested at PR 42540. Yes, that's what I'm saying... I'll comment on bug 42540.
