https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104800

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Btw, with -ftrapv it would mean we cannot re-order any signed arithmetic with
respect to volatile accesses unless we can prove it does not invoke (undefined,
but -ftrapv makes it implementation defined) signed overflow.

Reply via email to