https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104636
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The code does:
/* When converting from an init list we consider explicit
constructors, but actually trying to call one is an error. */
if (DECL_NONCONVERTING_P (convfn) && DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (convfn)
&& BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (expr)
/* Unless this is for direct-list-initialization. */
&& (!CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_INIT (expr) || convs->need_temporary_p)
/* And in C++98 a default constructor can't be explicit. */
&& cxx_dialect >= cxx11)
{
if (!(complain & tf_error))
return error_mark_node;
location_t loc = location_of (expr);
if (CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (expr) == 0
&& FUNCTION_FIRST_USER_PARMTYPE (convfn) != void_list_node)
{
auto_diagnostic_group d;
if (pedwarn (loc, 0, "converting to %qT from initializer list "
"would use explicit constructor %qD",
totype, convfn))
inform (loc, "in C++11 and above a default constructor "
"can be explicit");
}
else
error ("converting to %qT from initializer list would use "
"explicit constructor %qD", totype, convfn);
}
Again I don't think this is a bug.
