https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104550
--- Comment #7 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > > Maybe __builtin_clear_padding lowering should mark the load "MEM[(struct > > vx_audio_level *)&info]" as not needing a warning. > > Maybe padding clearing shouldn’t be exposed early but handled by > .DEFFEREd_INIT expansion? > If padding clearing is exposed too late till RTL expansion, some tree optimization will not be able to be applied on the expanded stores? the approach to mark the load "MEM" as not needing a warning might be better?
