https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102586

--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21)
> This patch implements the rejection of pointers to non-trivially-copyable
> types with the exception of &var or &parm, because in those cases we know it
> is complete object type and so don't need to worry about it being just a
> subobject.

OK.

I wonder why -fauto-var-init uses builtin_clear_padding instead of just
zero-initializing the whole object before normal initialization, as with
value-initialization?  With a new object we don't need to get clever.

Reply via email to