https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87680
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes this is fixed after the patch which fixes PR 92385.
We get now:
.LC0:
.long 10
.long 11
.long 12
.long 13
_3 = operator new (160000000);
MEM[(struct Bar *)_3] = {};
MEM <vector(4) int> [(int *)_3] = { 10, 11, 12, 13 };
vectp.6_7 = _3 + 16;
ivtmp.12_16 = (unsigned long) vectp.6_7;
_9 = (unsigned long) _3;
_13 = _9 + 160000000;
<bb 3> [local count: 106300463076]:
# ivtmp.12_18 = PHI <ivtmp.12_17(3), ivtmp.12_16(2)>
_8 = (void *) ivtmp.12_18;
MEM <vector(4) int> [(int *)_8] = { 10, 11, 12, 13 };
ivtmp.12_17 = ivtmp.12_18 + 16;
if (_13 == ivtmp.12_17)
goto <bb 4>; [1.00%]
else
goto <bb 3>; [99.00%]
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 92385 ***
