https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90769
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this issue can be distilled into the following testcase:
enum E { };
template<class>
int f(E e) {
return e + e;
}
int operator+(E, E) = delete; // #1
template int f<void>(E);
For e + e, should ADL be performed at instantiation time and therefore find the
later-declared #1? GCC, Clang and MSVC all appear to perform ADL here, and
they all reject this testcase. I'm not sure but I think ADL shouldn't be
performed here since since the operator expression is non-dependent.
