https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103836
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-12-27
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
void foo ()
{
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
#pragma omp target oacc_kernels
{
int i.0;
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
#pragma acc loop private(i.0) private(i)
for (i.0 = 0; i.0 < 2; i.0 = i.0 + 1)
{
i = i.0;
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
}
}
}
difference at gimplification time is ok, but
void foo ()
{
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
#pragma omp target oacc_data_kernels
{
try
@@ -10,12 +11,18 @@ void foo ()
{
int i.0;
+ #pragma omp target oacc_parallel_kernels_gang_single async(-1)
num_gangs(1)
+ {
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
+ }
#pragma omp target oacc_kernels async(-1)
{
#pragma acc loop private(i.0) private(i)
for (i.0 = 0; i.0 < 2; i.0 = i.0 + 1)
{
i = i.0;
+ # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT
}
}
__builtin_GOACC_wait (-2, 0);
from omp_oacc_kernels_decompose is not. Debug stmts shouldn't affect
code-generation decisions.
