https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18940
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is mostly fixed on the trunk.
What is left is:
# RANGE [1, 1073741823] NONZERO 1073741823
D1360_10 = n_9(D) >> 1;
...
# RANGE [4, 4294967292] NONZERO 4294967295
_18 = D1360_10 > 0 ? _19 : 4;
Notice how we have the range for D1360_10 but then don't optimize the COND_EXPR
....
