https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103636
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1) > I found the email here > http://patches-tcwg.linaro.org/patch/56399/ > I have suggested moving the check to einline only path but the v2 version of > patch did not implemented it and later it got in with the additional loop > walking clones. Is there any reason to prevent inlining > post-instrumentation? Oh, I likely installed the wrong version of the patch because I remember I wrote the patch..
