https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103603
Bug ID: 103603 Summary: [11 Regression] stack overflow on ranger for huge program, but OK for legacy Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kito at gcc dot gnu.org CC: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- ranger taking too deep recursive checking on program with lots of expression, but fixed on trunk via pr103254, however the patch-set is not easy to backport to GCC 11 since gimple-range-path.cc isn't exist at GCC 11. Testcase: ``` #define STMT \ t += 1; \ t *= 2; \ t -= 1; \ t &= 0xfff00fff; \ t ^= 0x14022; \ t %= 0xffffff3; \ t += 6; \ t *= 10; \ #define STMT2 STMT STMT #define STMT4 STMT2 STMT2 #define STMT8 STMT4 STMT4 #define STMT16 STMT8 STMT8 #define STMT32 STMT16 STMT16 #define STMT64 STMT32 STMT32 #define STMT128 STMT64 STMT64 #define STMT256 STMT128 STMT128 int foo(int init) { int t = init,i,iter; for(iter=0; iter < 2; ++iter) { STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 } return t; } ``` How to reproduce: $ gcc-11 xred.c -O2 # OK with --param=evrp-mode=legacy gcc-11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-11/README.Bugs> for instructions. Backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000000000141550f in gimple_ranger::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*) () (gdb) bt #0 0x000000000141550f in gimple_ranger::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*) () #1 0x0000000001417b9b in gimple_ranger::calc_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) () #2 0x0000000001418152 in gimple_ranger::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) () #3 0x0000000001413ce1 in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr(irange&, tree_node*, gimple*) () #4 0x0000000001415604 in gimple_ranger::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*) () #5 0x0000000001417b9b in gimple_ranger::calc_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) () #6 0x0000000001418152 in gimple_ranger::range_of_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) () #7 0x0000000001413ce1 in gimple_ranger::range_of_expr(irange&, tree_node*, gimple*) () #8 0x0000000001415604 in gimple_ranger::range_of_range_op(irange&, gimple*) () #9 0x0000000001417b9b in gimple_ranger::calc_stmt(irange&, gimple*, tree_node*) () Note: GCC 11 with--param=evrp-mode=legacy and GCC-12 (after g:d1c1919ef8a18eea9d5c1741f8c9adaabf5571f2) are work without stack overflow even more statement like that: ``` #define STMT \ t += 1; \ t *= 2; \ t -= 1; \ t &= 0xfff00fff; \ t ^= 0x14022; \ t %= 0xffffff3; \ t += 6; \ t *= 10; \ #define STMT2 STMT STMT #define STMT4 STMT2 STMT2 #define STMT8 STMT4 STMT4 #define STMT16 STMT8 STMT8 #define STMT32 STMT16 STMT16 #define STMT64 STMT32 STMT32 #define STMT128 STMT64 STMT64 #define STMT256 STMT128 STMT128 int foo(int init) { int t = init,i,iter; for(iter=0; iter < 2; ++iter) { STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 STMT256 } return t; } ```