https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34810
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Someone who has better understanding of the C++ standard should answer the
question if this is valid or not because I don't understand all of the specific
rules rules which are in play here. Especially when there has been some defect
reports in this area before even.
The question is:
class B { };
class A: public B {
A::B ab; // B is the inherited injected B
};
typename A::A a;
vs:
class B { };
class A: public B {
A::B ab; // B is the inherited injected B
};
struct A::A a;
CWG 318 clearifies the struct case but I don't see why typename would be
handled here any different from struct case.
