https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92479
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> I'm going to re-interpret -Wunreachable-code-{return,break} to mean to
> diagnose unreachable code _after_ a return stmt or a break stmt. It really
> looks like clang went out with a hammer, assigning a different option to
> each diagnostic invocation with a different text ...
I actually appreciate that about clang; additional warning flag granularity
helps to break warning-silencing tasks down in to more-easily manageable parts
when there are a lot of similar warnings. Sometimes I might want to only focus
on one while saving the other for later.
