https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103233
--- Comment #8 from alx.manpages at gmail dot com --- Hi Andrew, On 11/16/21 00:52, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103233 > > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Alejandro Colomar from comment #5) >> If glibc had a bug, >> and I compiled a C program that had perfectly defined behavior, >> would I receive a report for that error? > > Most C headers don't contain that much code in them unlike C++ headers which > contains a lot of the code due to template and such. > That being said if there was a C system header that had an issue and analyzer > was used and it would definitely report the failure. > > But that ignores the issue that C system headers are mostly just function > declarations and does not include much function definitions at all. > So again this is not just C vs C++ but rather how much code is in C++ system > headers and C++ not being supported. Seems fair enough to me. Feel free to close the bug. Thanks, Alex
