https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103223
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > I replied earlier on gcc-patches: I've always intended the access attribute > to eventually benefit optimization so please feel free (and encouraged :) to > use it > for that purpose. The idea behind it was not just to catch bugs but also to > enable optimizations based on the expectation that those bugs will have been > fixed. (This has to be done carefully since the attribute is also > implicitly added in contexts where relying on it wouldn't correct for > optimization; the attirbute API makes it possible to distinguish these > cases.) > > By dropping the attribute in IPA passes we would not only give up on > detecting the bugs the IPA transformations expose but also on the > optimization opportunities they might open up. Right. Can you please help us write code that creates access attribute from another one after parameters at given indices are dropped?
