https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103152
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > Started with r11-5890-g7d9767cb8eea0f21. > > Yes and no. > Tthis was actually fixed for GCC 11 by r11-7587-b610c30453d8 (you can > confirm that if you want). Note the latent issue (been since ?-1:0 was added to GCC 9) on GCC 10 and 9 were fixed by r10-10177-g4111b36079fe and r9-9765-g77867cd8185 (and didn't have the issue which I accidently did for the trunk). So this is trunk only issue still.
