https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103114 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > --- gcc/cp/parser.c.jj 2021-10-28 20:07:48.571193189 +0200 > +++ gcc/cp/parser.c 2021-11-08 10:18:02.042896144 +0100 > @@ -4804,9 +4804,9 @@ cp_parser_userdef_numeric_literal (cp_pa > else /* if (id_equal (suffix_id, "il")) */ > type = long_double_type_node; > > - value = build_complex (build_complex_type (type), > - fold_convert (type, integer_zero_node), > - fold_convert (type, value)); > + value = fold_build2 (COMPLEX_EXPR, build_complex_type (type), > + fold_convert (type, integer_zero_node), build_zero_cost (type) should be cheaper > + fold_convert (type, value)); > } > > if (cp_parser_uncommitted_to_tentative_parse_p (parser)) > does that indeed, for the usual case it will do fold_binary_loc -> const_binop > -> build_complex. > >
