https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103084
--- Comment #9 from M Welinder <terra at gnome dot org> --- I went back and looked at the proposal's revision history. TLDR: this just adds to the confusion. r3 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1099r3.html): * I read it as allowing "using enum Hog;" * No mention of elaborated-type-specifier r4 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1099r4.html): * I read it as *dis*allowing "using enum Hog;" * "using enum foo" defined in terms of elaborated-type-specifier (not -enum-) r5 (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1099r5.html): * This is the version that was approved * elaborated-enum-specifier first appears here * "using enum foo" defined in terms of elaborated-enum-specifier
