https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103061

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #5)
> > That is, is signed overflow undefined in overflow?
> 
> Errr, "is signed overflow undefined for integer(kind=4)?"

Yes it is undefined. Figures spec would have undefined code in it.

So the question to the reporter is does -fwrapv works for the original
testcase?

Reply via email to