https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102967
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> --- &*E is allowed for E == NULL, but I don't think this can be generalized to &E->m.
- [Bug c/102967] New: -Waddres... andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... andrew.cooper3 at citrix dot com via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... jbeulich at suse dot com via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... jbeulich at suse dot com via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug c/102967] confusin... msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
