https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #22)
> Perhaps the only solution is to not pretty-print the candidates, which is
> exactly what clang does:
>
> pr99.cc:8:10: error: call to 'f' is ambiguous
> return f(X<int>(), X<int>());
> ^
> pr99.cc:4:26: note: candidate function [with Q = int]
> template<typename Q> int f(X<int>, X<Q>);
> ^
> pr99.cc:5:26: note: candidate function [with B = int]
> template<typename B> int f(X<B>, X<myint>);
> ^
>
> Dodji, as the diagnostics maintainer, would that be an acceptable fix?
While Dodji is still technically listed as a diagnostics maintainer, David
Malcolm has been more active as such lately, so I'm cc-ing him, too, to ask
him...
