https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100112
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > I _think_ we have an almost exact duplicate but let me take it, this is > related to last_vuse - we're doing the lookup w/ VN_NOWALK and thus don't > see the hashtable entry with the "optimized" VUSE from last_vuse handling. Yes, You are thinking of PR 93891 which I linked here already in the see also field.
