https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82494
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > r9-3927 changed the type from int to HOST_WIDE_INT which is always at least > 64bit ... > > I also wonder if we could use wi::widest_int here. That's prohibitively expensive (storage-wise). Note propagating a failure upwards should in theory be possible (but it's going to "hurt" - welcome C++ exceptions?)