https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102401

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes this is the way the C++ standard is defined.  Even clang rejects it.  I
would have thought __builtin_clear_padding could be used in constexpr but I was
wrong.

Reply via email to