https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102370
--- Comment #2 from Bill Long <longb at cray dot com> --- I've sent a question back to the original submitter. On completion, the first argument to MOVE_ALLOC is unallocated, so it does look suspicious to be printing a component of an unallocated structure. I'll update when I get a revised test case.
